- Nexan Insights
- Posts
- Embedded Insurtech
Embedded Insurtech
The Race for Coverage, Not Just Your Phone, But Your Future

Welcome to the wild west of embedded insurance—a market that sounds like it covers you against getting your shoelaces caught in an escalator, but actually focuses on ensuring that your newest tech gadget, and your sense of financial security, are safely, well... embedded. Let's dive into this evolving landscape, full of traditional insurers, spry insurtechs, and a complicated global chess game where Samsung, Assurant, Bolttech, and others take their turns in Europe. Hold onto your smartphones (insured, I hope), because this ride is full of innovation, alliances, and oh-so-many acronyms.
Section 1: Meet the Insurers
First up: the players in the embedded insurance game. You have the seasoned champs, like Assurant and Chubb—think of them as the suit-wearing grandmasters of insurance. They know every rule, every regulation, and they play it so safe they probably have a five-point plan for eating a sandwich. Then, there are the new kids on the block—companies like Bolttech, Servify, and the lesser-known Qover—they’re agile, innovative, and prefer hoodies over suits.
In the insurance world, these insurtechs don’t hold all the risk in-house; they often outsource the risk to third-party underwriters. It’s a bit like borrowing your friend's lawn mower—you don’t own the risk of breaking it, but you're still responsible for keeping the lawn looking good. Insurtechs can move quickly because they're focused on managing the program rather than the underlying risk. But the question arises—can agility make up for old-school reliability?
Traditional Insurers vs. Insurtech: Risk Distribution in Embedded Insurance

Section 2: Samsung's Chessboard Strategy
Samsung’s approach to embedded insurance is like splitting Europe into three to bake a cake—three different bakers for three different types of frosting, all on the same cake. Western Europe got Assurant, Northern Europe got Bolttech, and Eastern Europe was handed to Servify. You can practically feel the Game of Thrones vibe—each region has its own king, tasked with defending against potential issues, and providing financial relief when someone drops their phone into a medieval moat.
The key here? A healthy dose of competition. Samsung didn’t want one provider to rule them all. Instead, they sliced Europe up, ensuring that every provider kept the others on their toes. Competitive pricing, flexible offerings, and regional expertise—it’s like Samsung turned Europe into a corporate Survivor series, minus the palm trees.
Samsung’s Insurance Strategy: Different Providers, Same Embedded Coverage

Section 3: The Evaluation Process (aka The Hunger Games)
Samsung’s selection process for these insurance partners can only be described as The Hunger Games for embedded insurance. Providers had to prove they could manage underwriting, deliver on customer service, and innovate—while still ensuring they were financially viable. Risk management was the primary factor. Essentially, Samsung was asking, “Can you insure our customers without giving us an ulcer?”
Next came the "commercial proposition," which is just a fancy way of saying, “Show us the money, but also make it cheap and effective.” The final factor was flexibility—Samsung needs companies that can quickly change gears and evolve with new customer demands. Imagine a reality show where contestants had to underwrite a risky new tech product in under two minutes—that's pretty much the vibe.
Samsung’s Insurance Hunger Games: The Race for Underwriting

Section 4: Traditional Players vs. Insurtechs
Assurant and Chubb have been around forever, and they've got an intricate dance routine when it comes to compliance and risk management. The insurtechs, on the other hand, are like kids at a dance-off—they're flashy, fast, and aren't afraid to innovate with a backflip or two. Where Assurant and Chubb bring their in-house risk management muscle, insurtechs rely on outsourcing for things like underwriting, focusing instead on customer experience and tech integrations.
The insurtech model isn’t necessarily better or worse, but it’s different. Samsung views this difference as an opportunity to innovate without getting bogged down by the bureaucratic weight of traditional insurers. Digital agility might not be everything, but in a world where people want one-click claims and instant solutions, insurtech's dance moves seem awfully tempting.
Traditional Insurers vs. Insurtechs: The Embedded Insurance Dance-Off

Section 5: Implementation and Pain Points
Switching insurance providers is like changing the plumbing in a skyscraper while everyone is still using the bathrooms. It’s complicated. Samsung faced this challenge head-on, knowing it was never going to be a straightforward swap. Custom APIs, compliance, repair networks, and market-specific integrations—everything needed to align seamlessly.
Replacing an insurance vendor isn’t just difficult because of the tech—it’s also a risk to customer perception. Picture a customer getting a new insurance contract and wondering why the coverage terms have changed for the fifteenth time in four years. It’s Samsung’s job to make sure these transitions are smooth, with as little disruption as possible. Maintaining a consistent customer experience is vital, which means sometimes it’s better to stick with the devil you know.
API Integrations & Compliance: Samsung's Embedded Insurance Maze

Section 6: The Future of Embedded Insurance—Commoditization vs. Innovation
One big question remains—is embedded insurance heading toward commoditization? As insurtechs become better and better at what they do, their differentiators might fade, making it harder to tell them apart. The emergence of AI, especially in claims management, promises a future where insurance is quicker, smoother, and perhaps less human. But with the giants like Assurant also catching on, how do the Bolttechs of the world stay ahead?
The answer seems to lie in being proactive. Insurtechs have to innovate faster, provide seamless customer experiences, and manage risks without dropping a beat. Samsung seems to believe in a future where traditional players adapt to stay in the race, but the spry insurtechs lead the way with new ideas, digital agility, and innovation.
The Future of Embedded Insurance: Adapt or Get Left Behind

Conclusion: The Balancing Act
In the end, Samsung’s strategy is about balance—managing risk, driving growth, maintaining customer experience, and fostering healthy competition among insurance partners. It’s not about one solution being perfect, but about ensuring there are enough options to keep everyone accountable. The embedded insurance landscape is complex, much like a kid’s doodle on MS Paint—it looks simple, but there’s always more beneath the surface. Let’s see if the insurtechs can maintain their agility or if the old guard can still outmaneuver them in the long game.
Balancing Act: Risk Management vs. Digital Agility

So, what's your take? Will insurtechs be able to maintain their edge, or will the established players catch up? Drop a comment below—I'm sure Assurant and Bolttech are taking notes.

