- Nexan Insights
- Posts
- The Duel in the Silicon Arena
The Duel in the Silicon Arena
Cadence vs. Synopsys in the World of Chip Design
This investor-focused table presents a detailed comparison of Synopsys and Cadence in the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) market. It highlights competitive dynamics, technological advancements, key growth drivers, and geopolitical risks shaping their future strategies.

Imagine you're on a battleground where the combatants aren't wielding swords but rather design tools for the most intricate microchips on Earth. On this battlefield, two titans, Synopsys and Cadence, are locked in a perpetual race to out-innovate each other and capture more of the electronics design automation (EDA) industry. If the chip industry were a medieval kingdom, Synopsys and Cadence would be the blacksmiths—creating the very tools that shape our technological future. Let's dive into the competitive intricacies of these two companies, their battles, their allies, and where this market war is headed.
1. The Kings of Chip Design: A Story of Specialties
Cadence and Synopsys are like two kingdoms in the land of EDA, each with its own specialties. Synopsys, known for its prowess in digital design tools, has long held a dominant position in helping companies design the logical and power-efficient cores of their chips. On the other side, Cadence is the master of analog design, a field where every detail and nuance matters—perfect for tasks like power regulation and audio signal processing.
But wait, there’s a twist! Over the years, both companies have tried to steal each other’s thunder. Synopsys has tried to claw its way into the analog domain, while Cadence has invested heavily to challenge Synopsys' dominance in digital. It’s like two archers learning each other’s skills to get an edge in every kind of battle.
Synopsys and Cadence dominate the EDA market with strengths in digital, analog design, and AI integration.s.

2. The Battle for AI-Driven Design
The influence of AI on chip design can’t be overstated. Picture AI as a powerful wizard casting spells to simplify complex tasks. In the past, creating chip designs was a highly labor-intensive process involving armies of engineers tweaking designs for optimization. Enter AI: the wizard who can take care of much of that work. Both Synopsys and Cadence have been investing in AI-driven tools that assist engineers in creating optimized chip designs faster and with fewer errors.
However, there’s an interesting twist—this AI wizard doesn't work for free. AI tools are built on top of the companies’ existing products, meaning more add-on sales. This drives an increase in revenue, even as it reduces the need for large engineering teams to do manual tasks.
AI tools significantly reduce chip design time, enhancing efficiency by nearly 50%.

3. Customer Switching: The Great Dilemma
Why don’t customers just switch from Synopsys to Cadence or vice versa if one offers a better price? Well, imagine switching from using a left-hand drive car to a right-hand drive. Sure, it’s doable, but it's a major hassle. Synopsys and Cadence have deeply embedded themselves in their customers' design flows—changing tools midstream is a massive effort, akin to rewiring the entire castle to use a different kind of plumbing.
The cost of switching includes training design engineers, dealing with compatibility issues, and the risk of disrupting projects in flight. The CAD (computer-aided design) teams responsible for making the change often treat new tools like a test they’d rather not take—unless there’s a really good reason.
AI-driven chip design boosts revenue and profitability while significantly reducing design time.

4. Growth Drivers: The Hyperscalers and Automotive Giants
One significant growth driver for both Synopsys and Cadence is the rise of hyperscalers—think Amazon, Google, and Microsoft—developing their own specialized chips. These hyperscalers want chips designed to be as efficient as possible for cloud computing, data handling, and AI tasks. Traditional chip designs don’t cut it anymore. That’s why companies like Synopsys are seeing an increase in demand; every hyperscaler wants their unique, optimized silicon, and that’s good news for EDA sales.
Then there are the automotive companies. Cars today are rolling computers, and they require everything from smart power management to specialized chips for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Companies like Tesla and even legacy automakers are now more interested than ever in designing their own chips. This trend towards custom silicon is fueling more chip design starts, and thus more business for both EDA players.
Hyperscalers and automotive sectors drive rapid growth in chip design starts, outpacing consumer electronics.

5. Moore’s Law is Dead—Long Live Chiplets!
Moore’s Law—that transistor density doubles every two years—may be on life support, but the EDA industry isn’t slowing down. The new wave of innovation involves techniques like 2.5D and 3D stacking. Imagine building with Lego blocks: instead of one big piece, you now combine smaller specialized pieces, or "chiplets," each handling a specific function. One handles processing, another handles memory, and yet another manages power—all stacked together in a single package.
This shift is driving complexity in design, which is fantastic for the EDA companies. Designing these packages requires sophisticated tools for interconnect optimization, thermal management, and signal integrity—areas where Synopsys and Cadence have developed specialized offerings.
Switching EDA tools poses challenges like training costs, software compatibility issues, and productivity loss.

6. Geopolitical Risks and the China Question
A major risk hanging over the EDA industry is geopolitical. A large chunk of revenue for both Synopsys and Cadence comes from China. If tensions between China and the U.S. worsen, the EDA industry could face restrictions that prevent sales to Chinese companies. This isn’t a small risk—it's like a knight losing access to an entire treasure chest.
Yet, the former Senior Director at Synopsys believes this risk is manageable. Most of the cutting-edge chip development still happens outside China, particularly at nodes below 7 nanometers. It will take China a long time to catch up to the kind of advanced tools and processes that Synopsys and Cadence provide.
China and North America account for 75% of Synopsys' revenue exposure.

7. The Financial Picture: It’s All About Volume Licensing
The EDA business model thrives on volume licensing—think of it as renting out a wizard’s magic scrolls. The contracts are generally multi-year (around three years), providing stable revenue streams for both Synopsys and Cadence. These licensing agreements aren’t based on the number of chips produced, but rather on the number of chip design starts.
With AI driving design efficiency and the growth of hyperscaler and automotive projects, the number of chip starts is increasing. This is why the EDA market can outpace growth in the broader semiconductor industry. It’s not about making more chips; it’s about making more designs.

Hyperscalers, automotive, and consumer electronics drive growth in chip design starts.

Wrap Up: Where Are the Kings Headed?
Cadence and Synopsys aren’t going anywhere soon. They are the dual guardians of chip design, making sure the tools are in place to continue pushing technological boundaries. Whether it’s AI, automotive, or hyperscaler-driven innovation, these two companies have positioned themselves at the very center of a booming industry.
The takeaway for investors? The EDA market is still a duopoly, and both kingdoms have room to grow as the world demands more custom silicon. While geopolitical risks loom, the complexity and scale required for cutting-edge chip design keep Synopsys and Cadence firmly in control of their destiny—for now, at least.
Synopsys and Cadence engage in a strategic battle for dominance in EDA through AI, hyperscaler, and automotive partnerships.

