- Nexan Insights
- Posts
- The Great Backup vs. Disaster Recovery Debate
The Great Backup vs. Disaster Recovery Debate
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Cloud

This table compares backup (data storage, slower recovery) and disaster recovery (fast, full-system restoration). Backup allows minimal data loss and takes hours or days, while disaster recovery ensures near-zero loss and recovery within minutes to hours. Key players include AWS, Rubrik, and Cohesity.
Imagine this: You're a business owner. It's a sunny Tuesday afternoon, and everything seems fine—until your data decides to pull a Houdini. Poof! It's gone. One moment it's there, the next it's vanished into the ether of misconfigured systems or network failures. Now, you're faced with a critical question: Is this a job for backup or disaster recovery? Spoiler: If you're confused, you're not alone—many smart folks are. So let’s peel back the cloud-covered curtain and see what’s really happening.
Backup vs. Disaster Recovery: Not Twins, Just Siblings with Trust Issues
Backup and disaster recovery are two sides of the same digital coin. They're related but certainly not identical. Picture backup as the doting sibling who’s always there to make sure all your old memories—your precious data—are safely stored in an album. Disaster recovery? That’s the sibling who rushes in, sirens blaring, when the worst happens. Backups are all about keeping the data, whereas disaster recovery is about getting it back and running smoothly when something terrible happens.
Key Differences: AWS, CloudEndure, and Their Partners-in-Crime
AWS and its competitors—think Rubrik, Cohesity—provide solutions that overlap in functionality but diverge in approach. AWS acquired CloudEndure in 2019 to make disaster recovery seamless for its cloud customers. But AWS is more like a giant shopping mall, where each shop specializes in specific services, and you often have to piece them together. Rubrik, on the other hand, wants to sell you a "do-it-all" toolkit—with specific strengths in VMware and SQL database backups.
Table 1: Feature Comparison Across AWS CloudEndure, Rubrik, and Cohesity

"Backup stores data safely, while disaster recovery ensures a seamless return to operations—same family, different roles."

The Evolution of Backup: From File Cabinets to Multi-AZ Snapshots
Once upon a time, backup was simple. A company would take its data and store it in a NAS box—basically, a dusty digital file cabinet. But as tech evolved, it wasn’t enough to simply store a backup in the same office—what if the entire building burned down? Enter the multi-region backup.
The idea is pretty simple: if your main data center gets obliterated (either by a flood or by aliens), there’s still a replica in another region that’s totally unaffected. This gave rise to RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and RTO (Recovery Time Objective) as the critical metrics that every company cared about.
RPO: How much data can I afford to lose?
RTO: How long until I’m back up and running?
RPO and RTO Performance Comparison Across Providers

"Backup ensures data is stored safely, while recovery time (RTO) determines how quickly operations can resume after a failure."

Disaster Recovery: When You Need More than Just Data Backup
Disaster recovery isn’t just about having your data somewhere else—it’s about having the entire ecosystem ready. It's like having not just a second car at your vacation home, but also a full tank of gas, the keys ready, and a plan to get to that home in a hurry. The faster you can get everything—not just data—running again, the more resilient your system is. AWS uses its sprawling infrastructure to help you cover multi-AZ (Availability Zone) backups—think of it as not just keeping the car ready, but building a multi-layer highway to get there.
That’s where the other players come in—like Rubrik and Cohesity. These companies have realized that one-size-fits-all is rarely true. You might have an application that’s always running on VMware—Rubrik has specialized in making sure you have both backup and disaster recovery ready for those environments. Instead of focusing on tons of services, they specialize in stitching together specific solutions well.
Advancing Towards Intelligent and Autonomous Disaster Recovery Systems

"Backup saves your data, but disaster recovery ensures you can get back on the road without missing a beat.

Choosing the Right Approach: Native, Hybrid, or Full Third-Party Solutions?
For a business, the choice comes down to three broad approaches: go native, use a hybrid, or bring in a third-party specialist. AWS native services, like CloudEndure, mean you have full integration but limited specialization. For companies who need to feel like they have tailored suits, they may need Rubrik or Cohesity—they offer a more integrated disaster management solution and better VMware compatibility. A large organization might even choose a hybrid approach: using CloudEndure for databases but bringing in Rubrik for specific apps that need better incremental backup capabilities.
But there's always the question: Do you want the "one-stop-shop" or the "best-in-breed"? Large enterprises may prefer the latter—why buy a "just okay" hammer when you can have a carpenter that knows the exact type of nails to use for each board?
Table 2: Cost Comparison of Disaster Recovery Solutions

"Choosing between native, hybrid, or third-party disaster recovery solutions is like picking the right toolkit—flexibility vs. specialization."s

The Future: More Automation, Less Panic
As more companies look toward cloud-native workloads, automation, and AI/ML-driven analytics in disaster recovery, the landscape gets interesting. The main challenge? Zero data loss and zero downtime. We’re entering a world where we not only want backups—we want our backup strategies to predict failures before they even happen. The companies that can automate the whole ecosystem—from continuous backup to anomaly detection and instantaneous disaster recovery—will win the hearts and minds of CTOs everywhere.
And remember: when things go wrong (and they will), you'll either have a dusty old backup that takes days to restore, or a spiffy disaster recovery solution that kicks in seamlessly and makes you look like a hero. Choose wisely.
"The future of disaster recovery lies in automation, predictive recovery, and self-healing infrastructure for seamless resilience."

