- Nexan Insights
- Posts
- The Great Battle for Semiconductor Supremacy
The Great Battle for Semiconductor Supremacy
Advanced Packaging Edition


A deep dive into the advanced semiconductor packaging competition between KLA, Onto, and Camtek, exploring innovations in 2.5D and 3D stacking, metrology tools, and market strategies. From high-bandwidth memory (HBM) to cutting-edge inspection, this analysis highlights how these players are shaping the future of chip manufacturing.
Imagine if semiconductor companies were warriors competing for the best armor and weapons in a world of knights and dragons. Today, we're diving deep into that very battle: the competition in advanced semiconductor packaging between giants like KLA, Onto, and Camtek. We'll navigate through 3D and 2.5D stacking, high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and the metrology and inspection tools that ensure everything works just as it should—all while keeping the humor light and the infographics looking like something a very ambitious kid tried drawing on MS Paint. Get ready for infographics that are simple but hopefully not too embarrassing. Let's go!
Meet the Competitors: KLA, Onto, and Camtek
KLA: Picture a giant, well-equipped knight with an impressive collection of medieval armor and tools—the kind of warrior that has been winning battles for decades. KLA is the market leader in wafer inspection and testing, and they're experts at covering every nook and cranny of the semiconductor production chain. Their strength is in their breadth; they cover everything from traditional wafer inspection to emerging 3D testing.
Onto: This is the nimble knight with a focus on advanced weapons for specialized fights. Onto doesn’t have the bulk or size of KLA, but it's quick, focused, and efficient—specializing in 2.5D and 3D packaging. In the evolving world of heterogeneous packaging (you know, when the CPU, GPU, and HBM all get along on the same tiny piece of silicon real estate), Onto is like the knight carrying a crossbow—targeted, specialized, and surprisingly effective.
Camtek: The middle-sized knight—not as specialized as Onto, but a worthy competitor. Camtek has traditional skills, but with a modern flair. They're still figuring out their best niche in this market, but don't count them out just yet—sometimes a knight with versatile skills ends up being the surprise MVP of the battle.
Each competitor has a unique approach to the market, with metrics like breadth of inspection capabilities, specialization rates, and flexibility in packaging applications that show where each player excels and where opportunities for growth lie.
Competitors' Strengths in Advanced Semiconductor Packaging – A Market Strength Analysis of KLA, Onto, and Camtek in 2.5D and 3D Packaging Strategies.

Table 1: Comparison of Leading Semiconductor Inspection Companies

Meet the Competitors – KLA, Onto, and Camtek Enter the Advanced Packaging Arena, Each Armed with Unique Strengths in Semiconductor Inspection and Metrology.

2.5D and 3D Stacking: A Love Story with Layers
You’ve probably heard that the future of chips is not just shrinking them but also stacking them. Imagine this like a high-rise apartment for silicon. In 2.5D, your CPU and GPU are living next door to each other on the same floor (substrate), with some awesome high-bandwidth pathways connecting their doors. In 3D, the HBM lives directly above the CPU like a loft apartment—it's vertical and efficient.
Why does this matter? Because the closer these parts live to each other, the faster they can exchange love notes—a.k.a. data—which is exactly what makes AI and other high-performance applications function at lightning speed. It’s not just about saving space; it’s about increasing speed, reducing energy use, and making sure everything talks without those annoying lag times.
Onto and Camtek are focusing their skills here, aiming to be the best inspectors of these delicate relationships—ensuring that every single silicon "tenant" is defect-free and works smoothly.
Advanced chip stacking technologies like 2.5D and 3D are essential for high-performance applications. Metrics like data transfer speeds, energy efficiency, and defect detection accuracy highlight the benefits of these packaging methods and the role of Onto and Camtek in quality assurance.
2.5D vs. 3D Stacking – A Comparison of Effectiveness in Semiconductor Packaging, Highlighting the Evolution Toward Faster, More Efficient High-Bandwidth Memory Integration.

Table 2: Comparison of 2.5D and 3D Stacking Technologies

5D and 3D Stacking – A Love Story with Layers: How High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), GPUs, and CPUs Are Stacked for Maximum Performance, with Onto and Camtek Ensuring Quality at Every Level.

3. KLA's Broad Sweep vs. Onto's Precision
KLA might be large, but it's not dumb. It knows that 3D is where the future lies, and it has plans—plans like eSL10 and Archer, metrology tools that are capable of inspecting these complex layers. While Onto and Camtek are sprinting ahead with their focused offerings, KLA is positioning itself to eventually become the biggest name in this market too—it's just a matter of time.
Think of it like a huge ship trying to catch up to a few speedboats. It takes time to turn around, but once it does, it can swallow the market in one fell swoop. KLA’s strategy includes potentially partnering with or acquiring Onto or Camtek—anything that helps it become a leader in advanced packaging and keep that double-digit market share growth.
For Onto, the challenge is clear: specialize, innovate, and do it quickly. Onto’s strategy involves owning the niche markets that KLA might not care about... until they do. It's like David trying to outsmart Goliath, knowing Goliath will eventually pick up a sling of his own.
KLA’s expansive inspection capabilities are balanced by Onto’s specialization, with metrics like market share growth, potential acquisition targets, and niche market ownership providing insight into each company’s strategy to maintain and expand its market position.
KLA vs Onto: Broad Market Coverage vs. Precision Specialization – Comparing Strategic Advantages in Semiconductor Packaging and Inspection.

Table 3: Strategic Approaches in Semiconductor Inspection by Leading Companies

KLA's Broad Sweep vs. Onto's Precision – A Market Battle Between an Industry Giant and Agile Challengers in Semiconductor Packaging.

4. Metrology and Inspection: The Unsung Heroes
Metrology isn’t just a fancy word to make semiconductor engineers sound smart—though it does that too. It’s crucial because without it, chips would be like IKEA furniture without an instruction manual. You might think you have everything in place, but there’s always that one missing piece.
The advanced packaging market—with its complex 3D memory stacks and tiny interconnects—requires precise metrology and inspection to ensure purity, quality, and reliability. Onto and Camtek are shining here, focusing on lithography testing and wafer-level inspection. Onto is especially focused on making sure that every layer’s purity is maintained—because you really don’t want your "apartment" crumbling under stress.
KLA is also upping its game in this area. The introduction of products like ICOS T890 shows their intent to make sure every die is as perfect as possible before it moves forward for assembly.
Metrology tools are critical for maintaining chip quality, with metrics like inspection accuracy, defect detection rates, and production yield improvements illustrating the value these tools bring to the semiconductor packaging process.
Metrology & Inspection Effectiveness: KLA leads, Onto excels in precision, Camtek remains competitive.

Table 4: Metrology Focus and Key Products in Semiconductor Packaging

Metrology & Inspection: The backbone of semiconductor quality—Onto, Camtek, and KLA ensure precision in every chip.

5. The Market Outlook: Growth, Challenges, and Future Kings
The growth of HBM and advanced packaging is being driven by the explosion of AI, data centers, and even consumer tech. By 2030, HBM could represent up to one-third of all DRAM shipped. This means metrology tools—like those from Onto, Camtek, and KLA—will be in even greater demand.
But there's a catch. As the market grows, KLA will inevitably look for ways to make itself the one-stop-shop for all advanced packaging needs. This means Onto and Camtek will either need to innovate faster or risk getting swallowed up or outperformed.
The real challenge for smaller players like Onto and Camtek isn’t just surviving—it's thriving and proving that their technologies are so essential that giants like KLA can’t ignore them. Partnerships, acquisitions, and roadmaps will all play a role in determining who will be king in the advanced packaging space in 2030. Will Onto or Camtek stay ahead, or will KLA eventually sail in and take it all?
The advanced packaging market, fueled by AI and high-performance computing demand, presents growth opportunities and challenges. Metrics such as HBM market share projections, annual market growth rate, and acquisition risk help investors assess each company’s potential for long-term success and resilience against market shifts.
Semiconductor Packaging Growth: KLA leads, Camtek shows strong potential, Onto follows with steady progress.

Table 6: Future Strategies and Key Focus Areas of Semiconductor Companies

Market Leadership 2030: KLA holds the crown, Onto and Camtek push forward in the AI and HBM-driven semiconductor race.

The semiconductor industry is entering a new era of competition, where size and scale may matter less than agility, specialization, and adaptability. KLA is still the heavyweight, but Onto and Camtek have the nimbleness that the future demands—at least for now. Whether we’ll see KLA partner with these smaller vendors, compete head-on, or simply acquire them, one thing is clear: the semiconductor packaging space is in for a thrilling battle.
If the future is a fight over high-rises, the key is making sure every single chip gets the best apartment in the building. And that’s what Onto, Camtek, and KLA are competing to do—one inspection at a time.
Future of Advanced Packaging: Technology innovation leads, specialization follows, and agility remains crucial.

Table 6: Future Trends and Growth Factors in Semiconductor Packaging


