- Nexan Insights
- Posts
- The Great Semiconductor Jigsaw Puzzle
The Great Semiconductor Jigsaw Puzzle
How SK Hynix Is Piecing Together the Future
A comparison of SK Hynix’s strategic decisions regarding local vs. global sourcing, cleanroom expansion, and supplier development, with a focus on technological gaps, cost efficiency, and competitive positioning in the semiconductor market.

Welcome, dear readers, to a journey into the world of semiconductor manufacturing, where nothing is ever simple and everything—literally everything—is connected. Today, we’re talking about how SK Hynix, a giant in the world of memory technology, is navigating the incredibly intricate dance of local versus global sourcing, equipment technology gaps, and the inevitable rise of new competitors. And yes, we’re going to do it all in Tim Urban style, complete with infographics that look like they were drawn by a kid with MS Paint (but I assure you, every doodle is bursting with insight).
1. Local Versus Global Sourcing—A Semiconductor Soap Opera
So, SK Hynix wants to have its equipment sourced locally. Why? The story is something like this: Imagine you’re running a kitchen where you’re making the fanciest gourmet dishes. You have super-specialized knives that can only be sharpened by someone from Tokyo who takes a 12-hour flight to help you out. It’s effective but not efficient. That’s basically what SK Hynix was dealing with when it came to sourcing its high-tech inspection and packaging tools from companies like Applied Materials (AMAT) and Tokyo Electron (TEL).
But it turns out that a domestic company (think of it as the "up-and-coming chef next door") is offering to sharpen those knives just as well—and cheaper—and they can do it by hopping on a 20-minute bus. Enter the desire for a domestic supply chain.
But of course, it's not that simple. Domestic companies still need to prove that they can do what AMAT and TEL are doing—and with semiconductor tools, proving that is a lot more complicated than sharpening a knife.
SK Hynix aims to reduce dependence on overseas equipment providers like AMAT and TEL by sourcing domestically. This shift would reduce response times for maintenance and upgrades, leading to greater operational efficiency and cost savings. However, domestic providers must demonstrate equivalent technological capabilities and reliability, which remains challenging due to the expertise gap. Investors are likely interested in how local sourcing could impact SK Hynix’s long-term margins and responsiveness.
"SK Hynix’s Supplier Dilemma: Balancing Cost Efficiency with Competitive Edge in Semiconductor Sourcing"


"SK Hynix’s Supplier Strategy: Fast-Tracking Local Partnerships or Sticking with Global Giants?"

2. KOVIS vs. Camtek—The Underdog Story
Enter KOVIS and Camtek, two companies in the battle for SK Hynix’s attention when it comes to inspection equipment. Imagine this as a race where Camtek has a 10-year head start. They’ve been training, collecting medals, and building a strong fanbase. KOVIS, on the other hand, is still trying to prove it can even make it to the start line.
Camtek is known for providing inspection tools that SK Hynix has been relying on to ensure that their memory chips are flawless. We’re talking high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips, the real stars of modern computing—without which, your favorite video game or AI chatbot would have a tough time doing anything cool.
KOVIS, meanwhile, is knocking on the door and saying, “Hey, I can do this too, and I’ll do it for cheaper!” But there’s a catch—SK Hynix needs proof. Proof that KOVIS can inspect the copper bumps between the memory stacks, proof that it can manage TSV (Through-Silicon Via) inspections, and proof that its technology is on par with Camtek’s.
And so, we’re in this limbo where SK Hynix is testing KOVIS equipment in a POC (Proof of Concept) for a year or two, with hopes that if KOVIS proves itself, they can eventually replace Camtek’s machines. Think of this as a reality show: “Who Wants to Be SK Hynix’s Next Equipment Provider?” Spoiler alert: it’s not going to be decided quickly.
Camtek has long supplied high-bandwidth memory (HBM) inspection equipment to SK Hynix, but KOVIS is now in a trial period to prove its capability to match Camtek’s standards. With a projected five-year technology gap, KOVIS faces hurdles in meeting critical TSV inspection benchmarks for copper bumps and memory stacks. This competition highlights potential cost-saving opportunities for SK Hynix, should KOVIS succeed, though there are notable risks in terms of inspection quality and reliability.
Table 1: Comparison of Camtek and KOVIS in Inspection Technologies


"Camtek vs. KOVIS: Can the Underdog Catch Up in SK Hynix’s Semiconductor Race?"

3. Cleanroom Capacity and the Packaging Pivot—Size Really Matters
Let’s talk about cleanroom capacity. In the semiconductor world, a cleanroom is like a sacred space where the magic happens—where silicon wafers turn into advanced memory modules. SK Hynix has been eyeing an expansion of its cleanroom capacity for TSV (the little pathways that connect different layers of memory). Think of TSV like the internal plumbing of a high-rise building. More TSV capacity means SK Hynix can build taller and fancier “high-rise” memory chips.
The catch? Cleanrooms don’t come cheap, and neither does the expansion of such facilities. SK Hynix is supposedly partnering with KIOXIA (another industry heavyweight) to expand its TSV capacity by 2025. But again, this is all about balancing investment with the promise of future returns—a challenge for any business, especially when new tech like HBM3 is on the horizon.
For SK Hynix, the packaging and inspection stages are where the magic gets boxed up and shipped out. And that's why they're investing more in these stages—making sure their memory modules are pristine before they ever reach a consumer product.
With the increasing demand for advanced HBM technologies, SK Hynix is expanding its cleanroom capacity to support TSV technology, essential for higher-density memory modules. This partnership with KIOXIA aims to upscale TSV infrastructure by 2025, enhancing their position in the high-performance memory market. For investors, this expansion signals a substantial capital expenditure with anticipated returns tied to SK Hynix’s competitive edge in HBM production.
"KOVIS’s Potential Payoff: Can SK Hynix Save Millions by Switching Suppliers?"

"SK Hynix’s Memory Expansion: Investing in Higher Capacity for a Competitive Edge"

4. The Long Game of Tech Catch-Up—Why Domestic Equipment Still Has a Ways to Go
SK Hynix's approach is pretty strategic. They want to support domestic companies, and the government likes that too. But there’s a huge gap between wanting to support local and actually replacing top-tier technology from established overseas players. When Camtek is miles ahead, KOVIS is trying to catch up by proving their concept, running tests, and navigating through engineering roadblocks.
It’s like running a marathon where you didn’t know the route until a day before the race, while your competitor has had a map for years. The domestic suppliers are at a disadvantage, but SK Hynix is giving them a chance—and with government incentives in play, it’s very much a “wait-and-watch” scenario.
So, what’s the big takeaway? It’s not so much a question of whether SK Hynix will make the switch to domestic suppliers, but rather when those suppliers can match or exceed what overseas vendors offer. And this “when” isn’t just about building a better inspection machine—it’s about building a whole ecosystem that supports innovation, tech support, and rapid problem-solving locally.
SK Hynix’s commitment to supporting domestic vendors like KOVIS aligns with government incentives, yet the technical disparities remain significant. Bridging this gap requires ongoing POCs and collaboration, as SK Hynix balances loyalty to local suppliers with the high stakes of global competitiveness. The extended timeline for domestic equipment to meet critical performance standards represents both a financial risk and a potential future payoff, depending on the progress made.
"SK Hynix’s Cleanroom Expansion: Capital Investments Scaling Up for Future Growth"

"Camtek vs. KOVIS: The Marathon of Semiconductor Equipment Innovation"

For SK Hynix, it’s all about playing the long game. Right now, they rely on a mix of local and overseas suppliers, each with its own advantages. The domestic players like KOVIS are getting better, but they still have a steep hill to climb before they can compete head-to-head with companies like Camtek.
But with the right incentives, patient support, and consistent improvements, it’s possible that one day, the underdog will come out on top. In the world of semiconductors, where every fraction of a nanometer counts, even the smallest innovations can turn the tide. And for SK Hynix, keeping their options open might just be the smartest strategy of all.
Table 2: Capital Expenditure and Expected ROI from 2023 to 2026


"SK Hynix’s Supplier Strategy: Balancing Experience with Potential and Government Support"

Table 3: Milestone Timelines for Camtek and KOVIS

Table 4: Risk Factor Comparison Between Overseas Competitors and Domestic Suppliers

