- Nexan Insights
- Posts
- The Story Behind Azure's Growth
The Story Behind Azure's Growth
A Giant Bootstrapped on Relationships, Competitive Struggles, and an Insatiable Drive to Catch AWS


1. Azure - Bootstrapping the Giant
Imagine you’re Microsoft in the early 2010s. AWS is in the cloud computing stratosphere, soaring with its early-mover advantage, and there’s you—scrambling, feeling late to the party, and thinking, "Why didn't we think of this sooner?" Enter Azure. Initially, it was a product meant to break into the market not as an independent innovation but leveraging Microsoft’s existing infrastructure and enterprise relationships. Think of it as Microsoft grabbing its old cash cows, putting them in a new barn, and saying, "Welcome to the cloud era, friends!"
In this first phase, Azure wasn't just a cloud competitor; it was an evolution in Microsoft’s approach—going from selling software licenses with three to five-year contracts to offering a usage-based model similar to AWS. There was no manual for such a transition, and there were plenty of bruises along the way. Microsoft had to convince the enterprise giants who were comfortable with the idea of “owning” their software, that it was cool to just rent cloud capacity. How do you tell someone who’s spent millions building their own infrastructure that they’ll be better off if they stop using it?
"Azure - Bootstrapping the Giant: How Microsoft Leveraged Partnerships, Pricing, and AI to Catch AWS"iant

2. Partners - Microsoft’s Secret Weapon
What do you do when you’re late to the party? You bring friends. Microsoft brought lots of friends. They created a whole partner ecosystem to support Azure. This wasn’t just a gimmick; it was a strategy, a beautifully disguised "Go Big or Go Home" move. You see, 80-90% of Azure’s revenue was "landed" through partners—independent software vendors (ISVs), managed service providers (MSPs), and other tech integrators.
Now, picture these partners as middle-school kids trying to fit in. They were used to selling on-premises products with elaborate implementation projects. Suddenly, everything was in the cloud, and they had to sell access and consumption. Microsoft provided the translation dictionary, onboarding them to understand what cloud really meant for customers. It was both educational and practical—partners co-sold, got paid, and helped Azure thrive.
But it wasn’t all smooth sailing. At times, local product reps would compete against each other within a single account. This led to what we’ll call a Microsoft-flavored soap opera: “The Battle of Local vs. Global Sales Teams.” Luckily, with great power (in the form of a massive partner ecosystem) comes the occasional internal fight over who gets the last piece of the cloud pie.
Microsoft’s partner ecosystem for Azure is a powerful growth engine that has allowed the platform to scale rapidly. ISVs, MSPs, and technology integrators play pivotal roles in driving cloud adoption. For hedge funds and investors, understanding the dynamics of this ecosystem is essential. These partners contribute not only to Azure’s top-line revenue but also to its long-term growth strategy through recurring revenue, high customer retention, and enabling large-scale digital transformations. The table below breaks down the key players, their roles, technical implications, and what investors should focus on:
Table 1: Azure Ecosystem - Partner Roles, Technical Implications, and Investor Insights

"Partners – Microsoft’s Secret Weapon: How Strategic Alliances Drove Azure’s Market Expansion" Weapon

3. Competitive Pricing Tactics - "We'll Match AWS, and then Some!"
Pricing, as it turns out, is an art form—especially when you are the underdog. Microsoft's strategy with Azure involved building "deal desks," where brilliant analysts would work to structure the licenses and pricing to compete with AWS. It’s a bit like running a lemonade stand next to someone who's been selling lemonade for years, except you offer a free cookie and promise cheaper refills.
Initially, Microsoft struggled to drive consumption. They realized that if people weren’t using Azure, they’d downgrade or switch out—meaning they’d lose the revenue base. So, they needed to turn Azure into something enterprises could not resist using, like a lemonade stand with Wi-Fi, couches, and air-conditioning on a summer day. They integrated Azure into the Microsoft suite of products—if you were using Office, it just made sense to use Azure. Oh, and it might have come with some “strategic” discounts if you were still on the fence.
Microsoft had several key strategies to catch up with AWS in the cloud services market. One of the major areas was competitive pricing tactics and how Azure was integrated into its broader ecosystem to drive adoption. Here's a breakdown of what Microsoft did to close the gap with AWS:
Pricing Innovation with Deal Desks: Microsoft set up "deal desks"—teams of analysts focused on crafting competitive pricing structures specifically aimed at undercutting AWS. This allowed Microsoft to match or offer lower prices than AWS, ensuring that Azure was not only cost-competitive but also appealing through flexible licensing agreements.
Consumption-Driven Pricing: Early on, Microsoft realized that customer consumption was key. Azure struggled initially because customers were downgrading or switching out. To remedy this, Microsoft focused on making Azure essential for enterprises by deeply integrating it with other Microsoft products (e.g., Office 365). This created a seamless experience that encouraged continuous usage, helping to reduce churn and lock in long-term consumption.
Product Integration with the Microsoft Suite: Azure was packaged as a natural extension of Microsoft’s ecosystem, including Office 365, Dynamics 365, and other enterprise tools. This bundling created a compelling case for enterprises to adopt Azure, especially if they were already using Microsoft's software. The strategic advantage here was that enterprises would be more likely to choose Azure over AWS due to its tight integration with existing software.
Discounts and Licensing Deals: Microsoft also offered strategic discounts to enterprises that were considering switching from AWS. These were often tied to licensing deals that bundled other Microsoft products, making Azure the more affordable option when comparing the overall enterprise technology stack.
Here’s a detailed table summarizing the key tactics used by Microsoft to compete with AWS:
Table 2: Azure Strategies - Key Tactics, Implementation, and Investor Implications

"Competitive Pricing Tactics: How Azure Took on AWS with Discounts, Bundles, and a ‘Free Cookie’ Strategy"

4. Multi-Cloud Dynamics - The Dance of ISVs
Now comes the real balancing act—convincing independent software vendors (ISVs) to go multi-cloud. AWS was always the first choice for these startups; they were built on AWS, loved it, and felt comfortable with it. Imagine Microsoft as the second-choice prom date—still great, just not the first pick.
This is where Microsoft’s corporate muscle-flexing and strong relationships made a difference. If an ISV was on AWS and a big Microsoft enterprise customer came calling, Microsoft could say, “Hey, we’ll throw in this great discount and make sure your Azure experience shines.” Slowly but surely, ISVs started offering multi-cloud options, driven by a mix of customer preferences and Microsoft’s persuasive pricing tactics. It wasn’t perfect, but the multi-cloud era is about diversification, reducing risk, and making strategic decisions.
To catch up with AWS, Microsoft had to employ several strategic tactics that involved competitive pricing, aggressive enterprise adoption strategies, and fostering multi-cloud ecosystems. As AWS was the first choice for startups and enterprises alike, Microsoft had to position Azure as an irresistible alternative. By leveraging its relationships with independent software vendors (ISVs) and bundling Azure with popular Microsoft services like Office 365, Microsoft slowly convinced enterprises and ISVs to adopt Azure in a multi-cloud environment. Their pricing flexibility through "deal desks," product integrations, and targeted discounts were key elements in this transformation. The table below illustrates how these strategies enabled Azure to gain market share and become a significant player in the cloud industry, attracting attention from both enterprises and investors.
Table 3: Market Share Trends and Growth Strategies for AWS and Microsoft Azure

"Multi-Cloud Dynamics: How ISVs Are Waltzing Between AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud"

5. Azure’s Competitive Advantage - Leveraging Integration
Azure didn’t just survive—it thrived by playing to Microsoft’s existing strengths. They took their enterprise connections and convinced IT teams that Azure made sense because it was seamlessly integrated with Office 365, Dynamics, and the rest of Microsoft’s offerings. It was all about creating a frictionless experience: the same security frameworks, same support systems, all in one familiar ecosystem.
What really turned the tide, though, was Microsoft’s partnership with OpenAI and the development of AI-based technologies. They bought into generative AI, got into the headlines, and leapfrogged AWS and Google in growth rates. Suddenly, Azure wasn’t just a "nice-to-have" option; it became an innovation driver. When the AI revolution took center stage, Microsoft found itself in the spotlight.
Microsoft's collaboration with OpenAI has had a transformative effect on Azure, reshaping its market position, accelerating growth, and driving AI-powered innovation across multiple sectors. The partnership allowed Azure to integrate cutting-edge AI models, positioning it as a leader in enterprise cloud services. The impact on Azure’s growth, its appeal to AI-driven industries, and its financial upside from higher-margin AI services are clear. Below is an infographic that visualizes the key areas impacted by this collaboration and the benefits it brings to investors.
Table 4: Impact of OpenAI Partnership on Azure's Growth and Innovation

"Azure’s Competitive Advantage: Driving Enterprise Adoption Through Seamless Integration"

